Dave Nadler
- Total activity 26
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 0
- Subscriptions 5
Comments
Recent activity by Dave Nadler Sort by recent activity-
Hi Jose - I'm having a terrible time with GCC for MSP430 from TI (and using the FreeRTOS port). Can you help with any of the problems I've seen?See the TI support forum: http://e2e.ti.com/support/m...
-
Apologies if this is a dumb question, just getting started with MSP430...Does FreeRTOS for this part handle context save for multiplier peripheral (for example on MSP4305310) ? If so, how ?Or shoul...
-
Yikes, I thought CMSIS was available everywhere for compatibility, sorry... One of the earlier posted ports had incorrect definitions for some of the NVIC registers and/or improper use of them, fix...
-
Thanks Richard - I'm back again briefly, starting to have a look. First dumb question:How come you are directly manipulating NVIC instead of using CMSIS ?Presumably you fixed the (earlier, incorrec...
-
A patch file is only useful if:- we are starting with a common set of sources- everyone is using the same tools (and patch utilities) So, perhaps a patch file is not so appropriate here ? Hope Rich...
-
Hi All - Attached is the version I have been using for a few weeks.This includes (for LPCXpresso/CodeRed GCC toolchain):- Giancarlo's fixes- Mark's changes to use CMSIS 2, replacing buggy direct ac...
-
Thanks Karl. Lets see if I follow... First, I think we agree that changing portSET_INTERRUPT_MASK and portCLEAR_INTERRUPT_MASK toNOPs in portmacro.h exposes a race condition inside all FreeRTOS fun...
-
Thanks Karl. I still a bit confused though... I think I understand that, because M0 does not implement BASEPRI, we can't easily tell the CPU"don't accept interruptions unless they are level 1 or le...
-
Hi Karl - Thanks for your continued effort here.A couple questions... You wrote: "We cannot uses anything but exception level 3 for kernel and syscall interrupts"Why is that ? Aren't these prioriti...
-
Thanks ! There were a couple of points in the code I was tempted to polish,but I was defeated by the "uniform assembly language" syntax... Easier usingT2 instructions but not that important... Rich...