
Richard Barry
- Total activity 130
- Last activity
- Member since
- Following 0 users
- Followed by 0 users
- Votes 0
- Subscriptions 48
Activity overview
Latest activity by Richard Barry-
Richard Barry created a post,
ATMega328P additions - thanks Sergey
Including a demo application - contained in the following repo: https://github.com/shchers/amazon-freertos
-
Richard Barry commented,
Fixed - thanks. Please post support requests (not that his is asking for support) to the support forum rather than the Interactive site.
-
Richard Barry commented,
Fixed - thanks (but this is not the support forum!)
-
Richard Barry created a post,
iMX7
Documented on the following link: http://developer.toradex.com/knowledge-base/freertos-on-the-cortex-m4-of-a-colibri-imx7
-
Richard Barry created a post,
32-bit and 64-bit RISC-V using GCC
Some notes on the attached project: The port automatically configures itself for 32-bit and 64-bit RISC-V architectures on basis of #defines set by GCC. The demo application runs on the spike simu...
-
Richard Barry commented,
Please post such questions to the FreeRTOS support forum. This forum provided for code sharing.
-
Richard Barry commented,
This is not the support forum - you will find a support link at the top of each page on the main FreeRTOS.org site, next to the logo. However, in this case I think there is an incompatibility with...
-
Richard Barry created a post,
Atmel SAM V71 ARM Cortex-M7 demo for Atmel Studio
This is a holding post for a project that will be included in the next FreeRTOS release. Documentation is on the following link: http://www.freertos.org/Atmel_SAMV7_Cortex-M7_RTOS_Demo.html
-
Richard Barry commented,
Dan - it will actually be the next demo to be released. It has been running with the FTP server for a very long time, but needs to be put into an SDK project. It will be announced on Twitter when...
-
Richard Barry commented,
> I uesd this port based on the version 14.4 of Xilinx ISE Design Suite and it worked on a Zynq APSoC based ZC702 boar. > Now I need TCP/IP function on this base. > Could you support this function...